Baroque Explorations

Baroque Explorations

Notes on the Writing Life

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

My first guest: Mary Novik

I've decided to "interview" writers of historical fiction about their research — in particular, writers of 17th century historical fiction. My first is the Canadian writer Mary Novik, whose novel Conceit awed me. In the poetry of its prose, it reminded me of Year of Wonders by Geraldine Brooks — high praise indeed.

Conceit is the story of John Donne's delightfully spunky daughter Pegge. I loved the way the novel changed voice — from the point-of-view of Pegge, to that of her mother and father. The details amazed and charmed me. Novik paints a vivid portrait of daily life in the 17th century. In an author's note, she writes: "... after all is said and done, this is my seventeenth century and I have invented joyfully and freely." Yes, but she is modest. I've been immersed in the 17th century for almost a decade, and, in my opinion, she has "created" it beautifully.

Some vivid and charming examples:
"The pimpernel has closed, but the dandelion is still open, so it is between two and three o'clock."

"I progressed cautiously into the salon, for I had discovered that my new farthingale went its own way without my legs if I moved quickly."

"Waiting on the west side of the Fleet, Pegge eyed the naked buttocks hanging down through the privies suspended over the eastern bank."
My questions to Mary were:
"Do you research and then write; do you research as you are writing? What is your pattern? Were there any surprising discoveries?"
Here is Mary Novik's account:
My novel Conceit began with a happy accident. Browsing in a bookshop in England, I chanced upon an erotic poem by John Donne that really intrigued me. Had he written it to the teenaged Ann More? I knew he had eloped with her and then complained, "John Donne. Ann Donne. Undone." I sought out his effigy in St Paul's Cathedral and stared at the smug grin carved into marble. What had happened between that passionate love affair and his death? I learned that Donne's effigy was the only one that survived the Great Fire of 1666. That night, I dreamt that his daughter Pegge was rescuing the effigy from the fire storm in Paul's. That sparked the opening scene of Conceit. Writing it, I looked for witnesses and found that Samuel Pepys, John Evelyn, and others had written dramatic accounts of the fire in their diaries.

Conceit evolved like this, by fits and starts, accidents and dreams. Many of the scenes in Conceit evolved from images or rhythmical phrases that stuck with me. I would write a passage, then run out of steam. To avoid writing, I'd read letters, diaries, or other 17th-century writings, or lie on the floor studying old drawings and maps. A catchy word, a peculiar detail, even a cul-de-sac on a map would send me back to my desk. In one of Donne's letters, he said "Pegge has the pox." I hunted for more about Pegge, but all I could find was church records. Strangely, this made her more appealing and she became the main character of the novel.

Researching events, buildings, and well-known people was easier than finding human details, the grit of life. Far too much came to light about Donne's public side, so I began to imagine his private life. Fortunately, he loved to have his portrait painted. There's a suggestive one of him as a youth--a sexy, brooding portrait of Jack Donne, the ladies' man. A more sober painting shows him as the Dean of St Paul's. His wife long dead, he was by then famous for his sermons. I wanted to get inside that Deanery, to find out what his seven children thought of him, but no biography could put me there. Locating his Will was a breakthrough, because as well as bequests, it listed the contents of the Deanery's rooms. It also mentioned an old servant, Elizabeth, who had looked after his daughters. This was delicious, since I had already invented such a person and named her Bess.

Most of my research was like this, discovering surprising facts, consulting eye-witnesses, and pure serendipity. I suppose this is why it took me seven years to get fully inside the characters, hearing, seeing, and even speaking as they did. Immersed in 17th-century English, I savoured oddball words that have been lost to us today. A happy discovery was that Donne invented the modern meaning of the word "sex." This led me to write a scene in which he gives the word "sex" to Ann on their wedding night, as well as a later one in which his children joke about the innuendos in his love poems.

[Image: John Donne as a melancholy lover, ca. 1595.]

There was one biography of Donne that I did like--the one written by Izaak Walton, the fisherman. This oddity was a treasure-trove. Full of delightful errors and myths, it revealed that Walton had not really known his subject. My Pegge would have been irate at this glorification of her father, who had a generous helping of warts. I tried to usher Walton firmly out the door, but he kept showing up in my novel. He hung about the Deanery, picking up crumbs of gossip to use in his biography. He pandered to the dying Donne, a prelude to writing his famous description of Donne's apotheosis in The Life and Death of Dr Donne.

I drew on my own experiences as well--walks along river pathways and childhood memories of a noisy household with five siblings. Michael Ondaatje said that facts breed and what they produce is fiction. I love that. I suppose if I had to sum up now, I'd say I was seeking verisimilitude, not historical accuracy. I like to think that if someone read a biography of Donne alongside my novel that they wouldn't contradict one another, they would simply reveal different sides of him. But most of all I hope the reader has as much fun reading Conceit as I had writing it.
Read this beautiful, passionate, poetic book!

(More information about Conceit and the 17th century may be found at http://www.marynovik.com.)

Cutting pages

It's thrilling to discover a book with uncut pages. I'm often tempted to leave the book as is — so virginal — but for the rather serious problem that I neet to read it, and cutting, therefore, is necessary.

My most recently acquired book — Molière by Brander Matthews — is uncut. It was only published in 1910, which amazes me. A book with uncut pages seems somehow prehistoric to me, a relic of an age long gone. But of course, it's simply that a great number of changes have taken place in the last century. I'm reading the delightful novel House of Mirth by Edith Warton, and once, on a train, the main character Lily sets to uncutting the pages of a novel, and later -- presumably because she was interrupted in her task (it is time-consuming) — a "uncut book" is on her bedside table.

And now — to cutting the pages. I'm wondering if Lily carried a cutting implement with her in her bag, and what that implement might have been. Certainly, it wouldn't have passed security.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Bravo!

I've mentioned Catherine Delors's blog, Versailles and more, on this site: it's brilliant. It has been awarded a prize and I'm joining in on the applause. Bravo, Catherine!

I especially love this in Catherine's response:
Lush, addictive... I am barely legal.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Cataloguing books

It's that in-between time of year: we're preparing to head south for the winter, to San Miguel de Allende. I've stacks of books in my office that need to be catalogued, and then shelved or put aside to be taken. Each one makes me pause, skim through, long for more time to linger. Leaving books behind is the hardest part of leaving.

One book I must make note of is Maggie Secara's A Compendium of Common Knowledge, 1558-1603; Elizabethan Commonplaces for Writers, Actors & Re-enactors. Although the period it covers is 50 years before my own, and England-based, it has a wealth of useful information about daily life that is applicable. I ordered the print edition, but it is also available for download. I highly recommend it.

Friday, October 17, 2008

I love this blog!

Through LinkedIn.com, I've been introduced to Holly Tucker, a 17th century historian with a speciality in medicine. Sing ye! Her blog — Wonders and Marvels — is both a wonder and a marvel. I will be learning a lot there.

Monday, October 13, 2008

A portrait of Louise?

I recently got an email from someone whose grandmother owns an old painting which is inscribed, on the back, Mlle de Lavallière.



I compared it to others of Louise, and frankly — comparing the eyes, the nose, the mouth — I think it might well be her.


There aren't very many known portraits of Louise, and it's exciting to find what might well be a new image.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

The Princess de Clèves and other stories

I read three (very short) novels by Madame de Lafayette while in Europe — or rather, three novels suspected to have been written by her, since a woman dared not put her name on a work. They were: Princess de Clèves, The Princess de Montpensier, and The Comtesse de Tende. All were illuminating about court life — to a point. The complete absence of children was curious. Overall, I was annoyed with the obsessive romantic interest — it reminded me of Grade Nine. The intense need to conceal emotions as well as the intensity of these "affairs of the heart," these "involuntary passions," was interesting, however.
"... there reigned at court a kind of orderly unrest which made life very enjoyable, but also very dangerous for a young girl."
The Princess de Clèves
Did love exist within a noble marriage? There seemed to be some contradiction on this point. A mother arranges a marriage for her daughter, believing that she is giving her a husband she could love. Passionate romantic love is assumed to be the province of an extramarital affair, yet sometimes a husband truly loves his wife. (Curiously, the reverse is not the case in any of these stories.)

These are historical novels, and often the known historical record was altered to suit the fiction: time shortened or lengthened, characters changed.

I would not call these works "novels" personally — there were few scenes, and very little dialogue. Rather, they seemed a told account, in the manner of a fable. I was surprised to read in the introduction that The Princess de Clèves is considered the first novel written in Europe. It was published in France in 1678. This must be a very narrow definition of what constitutes a "novel," for the comic novel Don Quixote (Part 1) was published in 1605.

This, from Wikipedia:
La Princesse de Clèves proved that France could actually produce novels of a particularly French taste. The Spanish enjoyed stories of proud Spaniards who fought duels to avenge their reputations. The French had a more refined taste with minute observation of human motives and behavior. The story was firmly a "novel" and not a "romance": a story of unparalleled female virtue, with a heroine who had had the chance to risk an illicit amour and not only withstood the temptation but made herself more unhappy by confessing her feelings to her husband. The gloom her story created was entirely new and sensational.
As an aside, it is said to be possible that The Princess de Clèves was possibly written by Ségrais (a man) or was a group project. My feeling is that the parts of the novel that concern emotions are very much the same voice of the other two novels — that of Madame de Lafayette, in short. Now and then there is a chunk of text inserted that is entirely not in keeping with that voice: long, factual, historical accounts. For these, I suspect a man's hand.
image